THE ENEMY OF OUR ENEMIES:
A Critique of Francis Parker Yockey's The Enemy
of Europe (section 5)
go to first section
by Professor Revilo P. Oliver
(Published in one volume with Francis Parker Yockey's The Enemy of
Europe, Liberty Bell Publications, November 1981)
THE THIRD SIDE OF THE COIN
We have, I think, followed Yockey and Robertson in drawing logical conclusions from the evidence before us. But all of our evidence--what we are told and what we are not told--comes from either Russian or Jewish sources. We do not have even a simple choice between stories told by two habitual liars, for when they disagree, both may still be lying, each in his own interest. And the world's masters of deceit are wily and subtle.
When travelling carnivals toured our country, the yokels were regularly fleeced by what was known as the shell game, which had many variations. In one variation, the sucker was led to believe that he had been given, inadvertently, a glimpse of the obverse of a coin and so could confidently bet on what would appear on the reverse when the shell was lifted, but, of course, when the coin was exposed, one with a different reverse had been substituted by a bit of prestidigitation.
When we ponder the Soviet enigma, one possibility always occurs to us, that internal rot within the empire may have gone much farther than we have been permitted to suspect by our sources--may have gone so far that what seems a monolithic state has some inner and hidden weakness great enough to affect its foreign policy. That speculative conjecture, however, we have always dismissed as gratuitous, since there was no plausible evidence to support it.
The periodical called Fortune, in its issue for 29 June 1981, published an astonishing article, entitled "Russia's Underground Millionaires," by a Jew, Konstantin Simis, formerly a Soviet lawyer and official in the Ministry of Justice, who says that in 1977, when the manuscript of a book that is to be published in this country was found in his apartment, he was invited to leave Russia and join his son, a professor in an American university.
According to this article, the Soviet is as rotten politically as the United States, although, of course, there are superficial differences. Corruption within the Communist Party we naturally take for granted, but here we are told of massive corruption of the Communist administration by bribery from outsiders, almost all of them Jews. There are distinct analogies to the almost universal political corruption that was established in this country in 1917 by the crackpots and mutton-heads who tried to prohibit our people from drinking alcoholic beverages.
We are told that there functions efficiently within the Soviet an enormous black market with its own factories, its own distribution-system, and its own retail outlets, operating comfortably by virtually wholesale bribery of Communist managers and police, and operated by capitalists, almost all of them Jews, who accumulate what are large fortunes by any standard and store their surplus wealth in gold, jewels, and other things that are intrinsically valuable. A typical entrepreneur, who was arrested, through some mischance, by the Secret Police, was found to have in his possession such valuables to the amount of 350,000,000 rubles, which, at current exchange, would equal $546,000,000.
This great essor of Jewish enterprise, according to the author,
began "in the mid-1930s" with such talented entrepreneurs and masqueraders
as Isaac Bach, who, while officially only a supervisor in a small workshop
and paid as such by the state, was secretly a capitalist worth some $135,720,000,
"owning at least a dozen factories manufacturing underwear, souvenirs,
and notions, and operating a network of stores in all the republics of
the Soviet Union." Such surreptitious business flourished, it should be
noted, while Lazar Moseevich Kaganovich was Stalin's Deputy Premier in
charge of industry, and naturally continued to flourish under his successor
in that office, Benjamin Dimschitz, another Jew. (41a) And it has now reached
the high financial level shown by the one example mentioned above, which,
we are given to understand, was not at all extraordinary, except that the
apostle of free enterprise either neglected to bribe all the officers of
the Secret Police concerned or was rashly careless in some way that made
it too awkward for them to cover up for him.
(41a. Dimschitz (or Dymshits) is the only Soviet official
of very high rank whom Wilmot Robertson (op. cit., p. 456, n. 16) recognizes
as a Jew. It's evidently a matter of the right man in the right place.
What is extremely curious is that he is not even mentioned in the list
published by Candour, to which I shall refer in note 48, below.)
The commercial activities of those energetic Jewish businessmen interest
us only because they are all categorically prohibited by Soviet law, which
provides for the guilty minimum penalties of years of imprisonment in slave
labor camps. It necessarily flourishes through a vast system of pay-offs
and the like (42) that would do credit to the genius for organization shown
by American politicians. There are "tens of thousands of such factories"
owned by capitalists of the black market, but almost all of them are actually
state factories, operated by managers appointed by the Communist government,
who fulfill their quotas and then turn to production for the capitalists,
using, of course, the machinery provided by that state, their working staff,
and sometimes materials provided by the state, although the production
for the black market is usually of better quality and uses better materials.
The manager must be given his cut, of course, and so must the workmen,
who are often employed on overtime. All government inspectors must be bribed,
and so must all local agents of the Secret Police, especially those in
the branch that is expressly charged with policing industry. Much of the
raw material must be obtained from nominally state establishments, with,
of course, a corresponding round of cuts and bribes. The retail outlets
are, for the most part, state stores which handle black-market goods surreptitiously,
and so managers and bookkeepers and clerks must be given their cuts and
massive bribery must keep inspectors and agents of the police in line.
And, of course, it is necessary to put the fix on the bureaucrats who preside
over the inspectors and agents. In short, the Communist empire must be
a seething mass of political corruption. And after all such business expenses,
the promoters reap huge profits and become enormously wealthy.
(42. When Franklin Roosevelt was gabbling about the "Four
Freedoms" to entertain the boobs during the Jewish Crusade Against Europe,
knowledgeable "New Dealers" defined the Four Freedoms as the rake-off,
the pay-off, the shakedown, and the fix. There are technical differences
between these four aspects of government in a "democracy," but we need
not define them here.)
The "tens of thousands of factories," we are told, are chiefly in Moscow, Odessa, Riga, Tiflis, and other major cities in which are concentrated the Jews now in Russia--some three million of them, according to Jewish sources, who are now being "discriminated against" by the Soviet, it not being explained why they are only half as numerous as the Jews who were "discriminated against" by the Czarist rgime, under which they owned half the industry of Russia, We may assume that free enterprise is providing good incomes for a large part of the three million, perhaps most of them in one way or another.
Despite the massive bribery of Communist officials, something more is
required for this vast clandestine business, which must be conducted without
written records, and in which sums that may amount to hundreds of thousands
of rubles exchange hands without documents of any kind or witnesses, "in
an atmosphere of complete trust," such as could never exist among legitimate
business men in this country. The explanation is given by the author: it
is "the sense of national identity among Jewish underground businessmen,"
who may not be eager to migrate to their race's capital in Palestine, but
"feel a blood relationship with it" and contribute money (in American currency!)
to it. If the commercial honesty that is dictated by a sense of racial
solidarity, which Aryans can only envy as they reflect with shame on the
egotistic venality and financial opportunism of their own people, is reinforced
by Jewish racial courts, the kahal, which some anti-Jewish writers
allege to be secretly maintained in Jewish colonies, the writer gives no
hint of them. (42a)
(42a. Jews vehemently deny the existence of the kahal
and denounce as "anti-Semitic" the Jew, Jacob Brafmann, who wrote the most
extensive and detailed description of the quasi-religious racial courts.
His work has been translated into German, with a learned commentary by
Dr. Siegfried Passarge, Das Buch vom Kahal, 2 vols., Leipzig, 1928.
See also the work of the Argentine writer, Hugo Wast, whose essay and novel,
El Kahal, is also published in Mexico (Editorial Diana, 6th edition,
1964). Wast describes the operation of the Jewish tribunal in modern Argentina,
and says "El Kahal es un soberano invisible y absoluto," which regulates
the entire life of Jews, "comercio, pol¡tico, religi¢n, vida
privada en sus detalles m s minuciosos." He says that the disciplinary
powers are vested in a secret tribunal, Beth Din, which, I gather,
operates with the summary powers and secrecy of the Westphalian Vehmgerichte
of the Thirteenth to Sixteenth Centuries, which will be familiar to many
readers from the description, doubtless with romantic amplification, in
Sir Walter Scott's Anne of Geierstein. The supreme kahal
of the Jews, with jurisdiction over all colonies of the international race,
sits in New York City, according to Wast. American attorneys who have handled
litigation between Jews who have tried to swindle each other are certain
no kahal is now in operation, but notice an odd convention in such
matters, e.g., a bitterly resentful and injured Jew will not denounce his
adversary for smuggling or fraud in income-tax reports, although he has
proof in his possession.)
One limitation on the felicity of Jewish capitalists in Russia is the need to observe some discretion in pubic display of their wealth, since too much ostentation has brought some of them to the attention of Communist authorities not on their payroll, with sad results. Prudent financiers limit their public expenditures to what they can pretend was legitimate income, e.g., from winning tickets in a state lottery, and amass their wealth in gold, jewels, and similar articles they can easily hide. Foreign money can be obtained, but would have no advantage in Russia. We may guess that the Rockefeller banks in Russia probably assist capitalists to transfer abroad holdings that they can enjoy when it pleases them to "defect" from Russia. The author suggests that the vast investments in gold and jewels, if not made for a miser's satisfaction in mere possession, may perhaps be held in anticipation of "the downfall of the Soviet régime."
If we accept Simis's account of the vast wealth of Soviet Jewry and
the pervasive corruption of Soviet government in all its functions, including
the Secret Police, it will be obvious that the ingenuity, secrecy, and
bribery that maintains the capitalists' clandestine businesses could also
promote a secret and formidable revolutionary underground, capable of striking
suddenly and perhaps decisively. And that will alter all our estimates
of the probabe future of the Soviet and of its capacity to wage a major
war. We accordingly wonder whether some credence may not be due to some
reports about efficient and ostensibly Christian "undergrounds" in the
Soviet. The reports once put out so industriously by evangelists who pretended
to solicit funds for such organizations can be dismissed as mere sucker-bait,
but, if Simis is right, such organizations could exist. (42b)
(42b. If we believe Paul R. Vaulin, The Regiment of
Kitezh (Mobile, Alabama, 1977), Russia is now honeycombed by a formidable
conspiracy of Christians, who have penetrated the Soviet bureaucracy and
even the Secret Police, having placed or enlisted secret agents in strategic
posts, and counting on exciting a revolt of "a quarter of a billion [Russian]
men" when the time comes. Two colleagues of the author on the faculty of
the University of South Alabama certify that the narrative "describes actual
events," was written by "an American agent" who was dropped by parachute
into Soviet territory in May 1972, and was copied from his manuscript,
which "was smuggled out of the USSR by an American student." They further
certify that Satan prevented the publication of the book by a commercial
publisher, so that it had to be published privately "without the permission
of Satan." If there is any truth to the story, the Soviet Secret Police
have become hopelessly inefficient and stupid. There is an implication
that the Christians' god keeps the conspiracy invisible to Communist eyes,
and it would seem that Satan hasn't been able to wake up the Politburo.)
We can neither affirm nor deny the accuracy of Simis's story. If that
number of Fortune has reached Russia, his report has probably been
denounced in Pravda as an "outrageous Fascist lie" and perhaps even
as "anti-Semitic," with many "proofs" of its spuriousness; if it hasn't
been, it will be, at least when his book is published. All that we can
do is say that the story is amazing, and put it down as another question
mark around the enigma.
AT THE WAILING WALL
We must grant that the evidence for the Jews' supposed loss of authority in Russia is meager and unsubstantial. Self-appointed "Kremlinologists" (!) expound to us the intentions behind certain Soviet policies, but mind-reading is always a hazardous business. It is true, for example, that Russia has supplied some weapons to the Semitic and largely Semitic countries that are menaced by the Jews' constant aggression and implacable hatred. (The Arabs and their allies, by the way, have always to pay cash to the Soviet, while the Jews have only to requisition all the equipment they want from their Americans serfs.) We are told that Russia clearly intends to impede the plan, of which the Jews openly boast, to make Jerusalem the capital from which Yahweh's Race will rule the whole world; but, for aught we know to the contrary, the subtle minds of Russia's rulers may be cozening the Arabs and planning eventually to betray them, as the Americans, for example, betrayed Chiang Kai-shek.
The nominally American government in Washington is in a fever of anxiety
over the supposed plight of the three millions of the Self-Chosen People
in Soviet territory, and claims to be squandering American resources as
bribes to the Russians to increase the privileges granted to Jews (but
no other race), in the hope that soon the whole three millions will follow
the 200,000 who have recently flown from the Soviet and, after touching
ground in Israel, flocked into the United States, except for a minority,
who, after getting a whiff of their tribesmen in Israel, promptly flew
back to their Soviet homes. (43) One cannot be impressed by the ostensible
reasons for a policy of which the net result is further to augment American
subsidies to the Soviet while simultaneously augmenting the saturation
of our country with Jews.
(43. It is true that the Russians do not seem eager to
welcome them back. The Daily World, 8 January 1979, reported that
300 Jews, who had left the Soviet, fled to Italy after they had a good
look at the ant-heap in Israel. They were appealing to the "United Nations,"
evidently in the hope that the clowns in that circus would intercede and
obtain for them permission to return home.)
The other evidence is much noise and very few facts, all of them no
better than the facts on which are based the Jews' assurance to the British
that in the United States the wicked "Neo-Nazis" are on the verge of stuffing
ten or twenty millions of God's persecuted darlings into crematoria. (44)
The Americans have had the awful audacity to investigate a rather grandiose,
but typical, Jewish hoax and expose its absurdity. (45) What the British
may be stupid enough to believe, I do not know, but the imminence of a
real "holocaust" in the United States will be considered unlikely by the
hapless Americans, who cringe before the Jewish Terror; who see the homes
of men who dare disbelieve the hoax besieged by mobs of Jews screaming
for their blood and threatening to burn them and their families in their
houses; who know that Presidents and Vice Presidents of the United States
who dared mutter in private some lack of reverence for Jews were
hounded from their office and forced to resign; who know that no business
man dares offend our masters, not even by subscribing to a journal that
does not have kosher approval, for even if it comes to a postoffice box
under an assumed name, the spies will learn his identity and the Jews stealthily
or openly will destroy his business and perhaps his family... It would
be idle to go on enumerating what is known by everyone who ventures to
raise his eyes and look about him. My point is that Americans should know
that the fact that Professor Butz has not yet been murdered and all copies
of his book destroyed by the F.B.I. is not satisfactory proof that the
United States is persecuting the People of God. And it may not be amiss
to consider Jewish lamentations about Russia with critical intelligence
rather than faith.
(44. See above, p. 73.)
(45. On the hoax about the "six million Jews" who are
said to have been exterminated in Germany before they migrated to the United
States and a few other lands and began to collect for their deaths from
the Germany they had ruined, the pioneer work was that of Paul Rassinier,
who had been himself an inmate of a German concentration camp and later
spent years in touring Europe vainly in search of someone who had actually
seen one of the famous "gas chambers," for which the basis, of course,
was only the Germans' attempts to control with disinfectants the epidemics
of typhus brought into the camps by Jews and their body lice. See Rassinier's
Lemensonge d'Ulysse (Paris, 1950) and its sequels, Ulysse trahi
par les siens (Paris, 1961), Le vritable procs Eichmann (Paris,
1962), and Le drame des Juifs europaens (Paris, 1961). An English
translation of the last of these was published by Steppingstones, Silver
Spring, Maryland, 1975, which issued in the following year a translation
of the book on the Eichmann trial (which Rassinier had originally intended
to entitle aptly, "Les maitre-chanteurs de Nuremberg"), now published by
the Historical Review Press, Chapel Ascote, Ladbroke, Southam, Warwickshire.
I understand that translations of Rassinier's several books are assembled
in Debunking the Genocide Myth, published by the Institute for Historical
Review, Torrance, California. The fullest and most systematic demolition
of the infamous hoax, which has been used to extort forty billion dollars
or more from the helpless people of Germany, is the masterly work of Professor
Arthur R. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, published by
Historical Review Press, s.a. (1976), and available from Liberty
Bell Publications; an American edition is published by the Institute for
Historical Review in California. An especially notable work in German is
Der Auschwitz Mythos (Tbingen, Grabert, 1979; available from Liberty
Bell Publications) by Judge Wilhelm Stäglich, who thus brought on
himself pseudo-legal vengeance by the Jews' puppet government in Bonn,
which tried to make him penniless and did succeed in depriving him of half
of his meager income. The author of a smaller volume on the same subject
is now in prison in Germany for having dared to contradict God's Master
Race. A very useful and handsomely illustrated book is William N. Grimstad's
The Six Million Reconsidered, s.l.&a. (1977), which has
been reprinted by the Historical Review Press in England and in the United
States by the Institute for Historical Review. Perhaps the most noteworthy
aspect of the "six million" hoax is the hoaxers' contempt for the simple-minded
Aryans: they did not take the trouble to make their various fictions plausible
or consistent. The point, of course, is that Aryans must be so trained
that their minds will freeze and all thought stop whenever one of God's
People speaks to the curs.)
One bit of evidence adduced by Wilmot Robertson is the publication of
the Ukrainian Academy of Science (in 1963) of a book that spoke of Jews
without reverence, and he adds that the Soviet authorities did not suppress
the book until after "world opinion," as manufactured by Jewish journalists,
began to howl. The suppression, however, does not satisfy the Jews, who
now wax indignant that its Satanic author was, after a time, permitted
to return to his employment, instead of being liquidated or starved to
death. (46)
(46. See, e.g., the article by Dr. Spier that I cite below.)
Although as late as 1979 the Jews were still assuring themselves in
some of their racial publications that their tribe was flourishing in the
Soviet and that 400,000 of them ensconced in Moscow alone were joyful,
(47) they are now telling themselves in their own publications, as well
as in "our" press (which they own or otherwise control) that the international
people are being "persecuted" by the vile Russians, in whose country they
have chosen to reside. The volume of this propaganda is enormous, and it
would be a waste of time to notice slight differences in the pitch of what
is just one unending screech, but, if we dare be so evil as to look at
a few specimens intelligently, we may derive some hints from them.
(47. A clever twist in propaganda was used by Aaron Vergelis,
editor of the periodical in Yiddish that is lavishly financed by the Soviet.
In his tour of this country in January 1979, he assured his Jewish audiences
from coast to coast that "Soviet Jews are building a new and happy life
in their [sic!] multi-national homeland," and that propaganda that
the Jews are not living high on the hog in the Soviet is really a form
of "anti-Semitism" spread by "anti-Communists" to incite hostility to the
Soviet and to encourage the nasty "anti-Semitic" elements in the United
States. "Anti-Sovietism," he proclaimed with Talmudic subtlety, "is the
greatest anti-Semitism." His speeches were widely reported in the frankly
Jewish press and summarized in the Daily World, 30 January 1979.)
A yell by Kevin Klose in the Washington Post, 15 July 1979, headed "Soviet Jews are Fearful of Rising Anti-Semitism," brings us the shocking news that many more Russians are now being given positions in the Russian universities and other "institutions of higher learning where Jews have traditionally excelled." A book published in only five hundred copies "calls Zionism 'the worst form of fascism' "--a statement which should be good for a laugh even in Russia. Another, of which 45,000 copies were printed, "alleges that 'Zionist centers' control Western media." One gathers that Russians should not be told of the Jews' virtually total dominion over the press and boob-tubes of the United States, Britain, France, and other Western nations. Chief among the horrors that are giving the three million Jews in Russia nervous palpitations are two letters one or more diabolic Russians may have produced on a mimeograph and are clandestinely circulating to some "members of the Moscow intelligentsia." One of these horrid letters declares that "both in the U.S. Senate and the Central Committee of the Communist Party there is a powerful Zionist lobby." Americans know about the Senate and the rest of "their" government in Washington, where, according to the press of 36 July, Reagan, "personally ordered" everyone to cease and desist from criticizing the Jews' terrorist bombing of Lebanon and slaughter of the Semites who don't understand that the Jews have a right to their homes and lives--acts which some misguided men thought tactless at the very time that the United States was about to rush another big shipment of our best weapons to Israel, for which Reagan has "a very special affection." We wonder, however, whether the mimeographed letter was as accurate about Russia as about the country that once was ours. A second letter, furtively typewritten and copied on a mimeograph, says that Brezhnev's wife is a Jewess--as everyone in and out of Russian has long known--and that there are only three "real Russians" among thirteen members of the ruling Politburo. There is no claim that the second statement is not equally true, but Klose reports a rumor that "Russophiles," persons so wicked that they love their own country, expecting that Brezhnev will soon depart from this world, are manoeuvering "within secret 'higher circles' of the [Communist] party...to heighten traditional Russian antagonism and force Jews from such positions of power and influence as they now hold." Just as though God's People didn't have a prescriptive right to "power and influence" over the lower races!
What interests us is the claim, in the mimeographed sheet that is being
clandestinely passed around to a few Russians, that the Russians have only
three representatives in the Politburo. The journal founded by the late
A.K. Chesterton, Candour, published in its issue for Nov.-Dec. 1978
a list, obtained from Russian sources, of the members of the Politburo.
This shows twenty-one men besides Brezhnev, and the score is: Russians,
6; race unascertained, 1; Jews, 14, including the Minister of Defence,
the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Chief of the Secret Police, and two
others, who are among "the most powerful men in the USSR." (48) Date and
place of birth are given and the real names of the Jews, most of whom operate
under aliases in public, as is their custom. Candour's informant
adds that "90% of the Soviet Ambassadors are Jews," and lists twelve examples.
Since I am unfortunately deprived of the revelations from on high that
enable so many in the "right wing" to know whatever they want to
believe, I cannot affirm either the accuracy of inaccuracy of the list
in Candour, but if the list contains no more than a fair percentage
of truth, it would seem that the international race has prematurely rushed
to its Wailing Wall, perhaps from sheer force of habit.
(48. It is odd that Candour and the clandestine
mimeographed sheet that scares the Jews in Russia agree only on Kosygin
as a loyal Russian. Candour's source had no information about Romanov,
and, what is most remarkable, Suslov, who is one of the three "real Russians"
on the mimeographed sheet, is identified in Candour as a Jew, born
in 1902 in the principal city of Azerbaijan, whose real name is Suess and
who is the principal representative in Russia of the B'nai B'rith that
operates in the United States and watches of the Aryan sheep. Cf. note
41a above.)
TOD UND VERKLRUNG
The most nearly sober of the current lamentations is a long article
by Ruben Ainsztein in the well-known and widely influential British periodical,
New Statesman. On the cover of the issue for 18 December 1978, where
it is illustrated by a photographic montage that shows the evil face of
Hitler behind the evil face of Stalin, the article is entitled, "Soviet
Union Today: Anti-semitism Institutionalized," but above the article itself
appears the apocalyptic title, "The End of Marxism-Leninism." The author
naturally does not miss a chance to reiterate the Jews' great "Holocaust"
hoax, and he assures us that "Only Stalin's mysterious [!] death saved
the Jews who had survived Hitler's Final Solution from annihilation." He
then speaks of the awful book that Robertson mentioned, but without quite
telling us that it was suppressed in 1963. His featured evidence, however,
is a confidential memorandum to certain committees in the Communist Party,
allegedly written by Valery Nikolayevich Yemelyanov, and presumably typewritten
or mimeographed, of which Jewish agents were able to filch part in January
1977. (49) In that memorandum Yemelyanov reportedly not only said unkind
things about the sacrosanct race, but even proposed the formation of an
international organization to unite civilized men of the West to oppose
and perhaps avert the consolidation of Jewish control over the entire planet.
(49. Further information about the memorandum that Yemelyanov
hoped to keep confidential is given in a despatch from Jerusalem published
in the Daily Telegraph, Britain's largest conservative newspaper,
on 9 March 1978. One of the Ministers in the Israeli government moaned
that the stolen memorandum was "an all-out declaration of war against the
Jews" by the one man who wrote it.)
I naturally cannot tell whether Yemelyanov did indeed express such evil
thoughts, but I note that in a long article in the Jewish Chronicle
(London), 25 July 1980, Dr. Howard Spier complacently remarks that the
"paranoid" Professor Yemelyanov had been fired from his academic position
and incarcerated in a ""psychiatric hospital." (50) That sounds to me as
though the Children of God still had influence in the Soviet Union, but
it does not prevent Dr. Spier from chattering with fear about the likelihood
of pogroms because, although "overt antisemitism" is not feasible in Russia
today, there are Russians who regret that it is not and who even dare to
write articles with "racial overtones," which are "thinly disguised antisemitism"
and therefore offensive to Yahweh's Master Race.
(50. Poor Yemelyanov must have been released from the
madhouse after Spier wrote, for a few lines in the Spanish press in January
1981 reported that he had been arrested and imprisoned for "racism," presumably
shortly before. Since Yemelyanov is, so far as we know, the only man in
the Soviet Union who has dared to suggest (in a confidential memorandum)
actual opposition to the Jews, it may be assumed that if he were publicly
crucified, the three million tribesmen in Soviet territory, who are now
quaking with terror, could sleep o'nights.)
Among the innumerable shrieks of the Jewish Banshee, none is better written or more coherent than Robert Wistrich's article on the wickedness of Stalin in the Jewish Chronicle, 22 February 1980. Like Ainsztein, Wistrich identifies Stalin as the serpent who appeared in the Soviet Eden and, after beguiling the Slavic Eve by justly equating disrespect for Jews with cannibalism and making it punishable by death, finally gave effect to the evil thoughts he had secretly harbored in his black soul for a long time and slyly sold her the deadly apple of patriotism. The article is noteworthy for the relative absence of the usual hysteria and for its author's respect for logic, and especially because it identifies, as did Yockey, the hanging of the eleven Jews in Prague as the turning point of Stalin's policy: "for the first time, antisemitism and anti-Zionism openly fused." The trials in Prague were a first step toward "Stalin's own Final Solution of the Jewish question--mass deportations to Siberia....The plan was foiled [sic!]" by the opportune death of Stalin. Stalin's policy was reversed, he is now discredited, and his monuments "have been pulled down," but the terrible thing is that "Stalin's heirs...studiously avoided mentioning antisemitism in the catalogue of his crimes." And that means, oh horrors! that we "must reckon with the return of the pogrom traditions of the Tsarist State under a thin veneer of Marxist-Leninist verbiage."
Two of the best articles, which I have mentioned, and numerous others
assert that Stalin intended in his own mind to solve Russia's Jewish problem
by either transporting the aliens to Siberia, as Wistrich says, or by exterminating
them, as Ainsztein claims, presumably by finding engineers and chemists
who could overcome the practical obstacles to constructing and operating
"gas chambers," such as are celebrated in the Jews' great hoax about the
"six million." (51) The evidence that Stalin had in petto a plan
to become the Antichrist (52) is both meager and in conflict with all of
his career before he was seventy-three, but we must remember that Dzhugashvili
began his career as a theological student and doubtless acquired early
the arts of dissimulation and hypocrisy, in which he must have perfected
himself. There can be no doubt but that he was a highly intelligent man,
so it is out of the question that he could ever have taken seriously the
Marxist religion, which he used to manipulate the misfits, simpletons,
idealists, and other crackpots over whom he climbed to power, and to outwit
his fellow thugs. (53) So talented a man could have concealed even from
Jews his opinion of them, but it is also possible that he, like Luther
and many other men, trusted the Jews during the greater part of his career
and changed his mind only late in life.
(51. The choice of this number may have some special significance.
In the early years of this century, and especially during the administration
of President Taft, American busybodies were a-twitter over the supposed
plight of the six million dear Jews who were "imprisoned" in Czarist
Russia because they preferred not to leave it.)
(52. It must be remembered that the term 'antichrist'
does not specifically refer to the christ called Jesus who is the hero
of the "New Testament." A christ is, of course, a divinely-appointed King
of the Jews, who will lead his race to a solution of the Gentile problem
by exterminating Aryans and the like, except for some who may be spared
for slavery. The apocalyptic fantasies of the Jews call for the appearance
of an 'antichrist,' i.e., a particularly disrespectful and wicked goy,
before the appearance of the real christ, who will put the lower races
in their place. An 'antichrist,' therefore, is a powerful adversary of
the Jews, except, of course, in Christian terminology.)
(53. It goes without saying that Communist leaders do
not believe in Communism. An acute young American, Duane Thorin, who had
been intensively interrogated while a prisoner, stated the facts concisely
in A Ride to Pannunjom (Chicago, Regnery, 1956): "Intellects that
failed to see through the falsities of communism were so arrested that
they were of only limited use in the totalitarian state." Czeslaw Milosz
in The Captive Mind (New York, 1953) devotes a chapter to the practice
of ketman by the more intelligent Communist professionals as they
jostle for places on the ladder: like Moslem and Christian theologians,
they feign a belief in the orthodox doctrine of their sect and try to catch
each other out by devising Talmudic quibbles as traps to obtain admissions
that will justify a charge of heresy.)
The best proof that Stalin was or became inimical to the Self-Chosen
People is that a pack of Jewish physicians tried to poison him a few weeks
before he died suddenly, reportedly of a "cerebral haemorrhage." They would
not have done so without good reason. It is true that some persons believe
the story that the physicians were innocent, but they do so on the usual
grounds that Jews are "righteous" people, and without reflecting that nothing
could be more righteous than killing goyim that get in the way of
God's Own. As all Christians well know, that is the lesson that is taught
throughout the "Old Testament," which seems such an appalling record of
crime to persons who read it without Faith. (54) The virtually infinite
superiority of their race is taken for granted and openly avowed by Jews
today. (55) The Holy People, for example, did not hesitate to boast over
the French radio of their cleverness in poisoning a thousand German officers
by slyly putting arsenic in the bread they baked for them. (56) And, as
everyone known, Begin, who is now dropping bombs on the civilian population
of Lebanon in preparation for conquest and annexation of that helpless
country, early distinguished himself by his efficiency in killing goyim,
such as the English men, women, and children whom he blew up by planting
a bomb in their hotel. For such valiant deeds he is sometimes criticized
adversely by "aunt-eye-see-mights," who do not understand that his victims
were just English pigs and probably should have been butchered anyway.
(57)
(54. Christians, I understand, find especially edifying
the tale that is told about Moses in Exodus, 2.11-15, 19; 4.19-20.
Seeing an Egyptian treat a Jew harshly, Moses found an opportunity to catch
the goy alone and, after looking all around to make sure no one
could see them, rubbed him out, probably by stealing up behind him and
stabbing him in the back. Moses hid the body in the sand, but when he found
that someone had seen him after all and would turn stool-pigeon, his chutzpah
failed him and he took it on the lam across the border into a foreign country,
where, passing himself off as an Egyptian, he lay low for many years until
God came to his hide-out and told him the heat was off in Egypt and the
cops were no longer looking for him.)
(55. According to the press, Dr. Michael Wyschogrod, Professor
of Philosophy in the City University of New York, frankly told a conference
sponsored by the National Conference of Christians and Jews that there
was a vast difference between harming a Jew and killing goyim, because
"what happens to the Jewish people is not quite the same" as what happens
to other people in that there is "an element of the divine" in Jewish history
that makes it special. He admitted that "humanists" and other irreligious
persons would think the racial distinction "a scandal," but that is because
they do not "grasp the uniqueness of Jewish history." Dr. Wyschogrod also
told his audience what makes that uniqueness: the fact that a Jew is always
a detached limb of his race and only secondarily an individual. "I am first
a member of the Jewish people," he declared, "and only secondarily Michael
Wyschogrod." That, of course, is something an Aryan can never understand,
for while he may feel a loyalty to, or a duty towards, a class or nation,
he can do so only as an individual, and even the strongest effort
of the imagination will not enable him to think of himself as having the
relation to his race that a member of his body bears to him. The conference
was reported in The Christian News, 30 April 1981, p. 15.)
(56. See the Toronto Daily Star, 9 March 1968.)
(57. Cf. note 38 above.)
The heroic physicians, like the Lopez who was the personal physician of Queen Elizabeth I and tried to poison her, were caught, but we shall never know whether they had colleagues who were more successful. It is, of course, not unusual for men of Stalin's age to die of natural causes, but a sudden death that occurs so soon after an unsuccessful attempt at assassination, and occurs so opportunely--should we say providentially?--for a man's deadly enemies will always arouse suspicions.
When a great monarch dies, there is always a bitter struggle for power
among the diadochi, and from what we know of Communists and given
the impossibility of dividing the empire, we may be certain that the contest
in Russia was especially vicious, but the essential facts concerning it
remain secret. Eventually Khrushchev, whatever his antecedents, (58) came
out on top, having pleased his henchmen by vituperating the man who had
saved Russia, the Soviet, and Communism from the German invasion. In 1961,
he ejected ignominiously from its tomb the body of the architect of Russia's
position as a world-power, had his monuments and memorials destroyed, and
even carried post-mortem hatred so far as to change the name of Stalingrad,
the site of Russia's most celebrated victory. Such spitting on a national
hero and the sheer fury of the posthumous vengeance taken on him, must
have had a deeper motive than a mere courting of popularity among the serfs,
as sometimes happens in "democratic" countries. In fact, the vitriolic
denunciation of Stalin for "tyranny" was a somewhat hazardous gambit, since
it might encourage discontent with that tyranny, which was continued with
only superficial changes. What the motive was, however, we cannot determine:
it may have been known only to the inner circle of the Politburo and must
remain an enigma for us.
(58. I refuse to debate the vexed question whether or
not Khrushchev was really a Jew masquerading as a Slav. The evidence on
both sides of the question is suspect.)
In sum, then, the evidence before us warrants the conclusion that for
a period of about six months--from early November 1952 until 5 March 1953--Dzhugashvili-Stalin
openly showed a certain hostility toward the Jews that he had doubtless
meditated for some time before putting it into practice. (59) It is reasonable
to conjecture that he may have intended or wished to put into practice
the stated principles of Zionism. During those six months or more, the
Jews seem to have lost the power to control Russian policy, and it may
be they did not subsequently recover their dominance over it. (60) There
is evidence that Russians are now permitted to occupy in the universities
and bureaucracy positions that Jews want.
(59. The earlier stages of the affair that reached its
climax with the hanging of the eleven Jews in Prague are uncertain. The
most important of these Jews, Rudolf [nice Germanic name, Gothic hrôth-wulfs!]
Slánsky, was arrested on a charge of treason on 27 November 1951,
but the Czech executive who had formally ordered the arrest, Kópriva,
was himself arrested on 23 January 1952, thus producing a neat confusion
to keep everyone puzzled.)
(60. By far the most complete and objective treatment
of the whole question known to me is the late Andrey Diky's Jews in
Russia and in the USSR, s.l.a. [1978?]. When I last heard, copies
could be obtained from L. Volovlikoff, P.O. Box 8082, Ottawa, Ontario.
This work is based on Russian and Ukrainian sources not generally available,
especially periodicals, and its author makes every effort to be fair and
more than fair to the Jews, giving them the benefit of every doubt. In
an appendix, pp. 297-319, the author lists the officials of the eleven
principal organs of the Soviet government from 1932 to 1939. Here are the
totals: Jews, 447; non-Jews, 68; race undetermined, 34.)
For the rest, we can only note that there is not the slightest indication
that the present rgime in Russia intends to accept the theory of Zionism,
as it would surely do, if it wished to rid its territory of Jews. Hitler,
to be sure, accepted Zionism and made great efforts to foster it, and the
Jews will never forgive him for having taken them at their word, but nevertheless
a rgime that is really anti-Jewish would not overlook the enormous advantage
it would obtain by officially supporting Zionism. (61)
(61. As we all know--or should know--the premise on which
the Zionist movement was founded, and on the basis of which support for
it (including the Balfour Declaration) was solicited, was that Jews and
Europeans represent incompatible races and cultures, and that the presence
of the aliens in Europe will always result in irremediable tension and
animosities, to the distress of all concerned. The only solution, therefore,
was the creation of a "homeland" to which all Jews could emigrate and in
which they could form a nation that would have a geographic unity corresponding
to its spiritual unity. See the writings of the founder of Zionism, Theodor
Herzl, in his Tagebucher (Berlin, 1922-23) and the passages that
were suppressed in the German edition but restored by Marvin Lowenthal
in his translation of excerpts (New York, 1956). Herzl's diaries record
his negotiations with various European monarchs and prime ministers and
his reactions to their attitudes, and I can find in his writings no indication
that he was not sincere in his purpose. He did obtain from the British
government in 1903 the offer of East Africa as the desired homeland, and
was bitterly disappointed when the Jewish Congress rejected the offer.
As is well known, the National Socialist government of Germany made great
efforts to obtain a homeland for the Jews in Palestine, Madagascar, and
in a large part of the territory of the former Russian Empire; these efforts
were successively frustrated by Great Britain, France, and the defeat of
Germany in 1945. -- It is faintly amusing that Kevin Klose, in the article
about "Anti-Semitism" in the Soviet that I mentioned above, lists a report
that when the Russians grant exit visas to the Jews who wish to emigrate,
they maliciously give preference to the ones who will head for the United
States instead of remaining in the national ghetto, where they could enjoy
"family [i.e., racial] reunification.)
We are here interested in Yockey. From the foregoing it will appear that he, more alert and perspicacious than other observers, was right in his analysis of the situation in Europe and the world in 1948-52, when he wrote The Enemy of Europe. He did not foresee the sudden death of Stalin, and it can be argued that if Stalin had survived for a lustrum after 1953, Yockey's prognosis would have been fully verified and the history of Europe and of the entire world would have taken a far different direction.
Yockey did not live to witness the official denigration and vilification
of Stalin that began in 1961. You may wish to determine in your own mind
what conclusions he would have drawn from that astonishing reversal of
Russian propaganda, and whether or not he would have revised The Enemy
of Europe to take it into account.
Cont'd in Section 6
For reprint information please write to Liberty Bell Publications, Post Office Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA.
Copyright ©1999 Kevin Alfred Strom. Back to Revilo P. Oliver Index